Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks or KANs have shown the ability to outperform classical Deep Neural Networks, while using far fewer trainable parameters for regression problems on scientific domains. Even more powerful has been their interpretability due to their structure being composed of univariate B-Spline functions. This enables us to derive closed-form equations from trained KANs for a wide range of problems. This paper introduces a quantum-inspired variant of the KAN based on Quantum Data Re-uploading (DR) models. The Quantum-Inspired Re-uploading KAN or QuIRK model replaces B-Splines with single-qubit DR models as the univariate function approximator, allowing them to match or outperform traditional KANs while using even fewer parameters. This is especially apparent in the case of periodic functions. Additionally, since the model utilizes only single-qubit circuits, it remains classically tractable to simulate with straightforward GPU acceleration. Finally, we also demonstrate that QuIRK retains the interpretability advantages and the ability to produce closed-form solutions.

Dense Retrieval (DR) models have proven to be effective for Document Retrieval and Information Grounding tasks. Usually, these models are trained and optimized for improving the relevance of top-ranked documents for a given query. Previous work has shown that popular DR models are sensitive to the query and document lexicon: small variations of it may lead to a significant difference in the set of retrieved documents. In this paper, we propose a variation of the Multi-Negative Ranking loss for training DR that improves the coherence of models in retrieving the same documents with respect to semantically similar queries. The loss penalizes discrepancies between the top-k ranked documents retrieved for diverse but semantic equivalent queries. We conducted extensive experiments on various datasets, MS-MARCO, Natural Questions, BEIR, and TREC DL 19/20. The results show that (i) models optimizes by our loss are subject to lower sensitivity, and, (ii) interestingly, higher accuracy.

Information tasks such as writing surveys or analytical reports require complex search and reasoning, and have recently been grouped under the umbrella of \textit{deep research} -- a term also adopted by recent models targeting these capabilities. Despite growing interest, the scope of the deep research task remains underdefined and its distinction from other reasoning-intensive problems is poorly understood. In this paper, we propose a formal characterization of the deep research (DR) task and introduce a benchmark to evaluate the performance of DR systems. We argue that the core defining feature of deep research is not the production of lengthy report-style outputs, but rather the high fan-out over concepts required during the search process, i.e., broad and reasoning-intensive exploration. To enable objective evaluation, we define DR using an intermediate output representation that encodes key claims uncovered during search-separating the reasoning challenge from surface-level report generation. Based on this formulation, we propose a diverse, challenging benchmark LiveDRBench with 100 challenging tasks over scientific topics (e.g., datasets, materials discovery, prior art search) and public interest events (e.g., flight incidents, movie awards). Across state-of-the-art DR systems, F1 score ranges between 0.02 and 0.72 for any sub-category. OpenAI's model performs the best with an overall F1 score of 0.55. Analysis of reasoning traces reveals the distribution over the number of referenced sources, branching, and backtracking events executed by current DR systems, motivating future directions for improving their search mechanisms and grounding capabilities. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/microsoft/LiveDRBench.

Deploying dense retrieval models efficiently is becoming increasingly important across various industries. This is especially true for enterprise search services, where customizing search engines to meet the time demands of different enterprises in different domains is crucial. Motivated by this, we develop a time-efficient approach called DREditor to edit the matching rule of an off-the-shelf dense retrieval model to suit a specific domain. This is achieved by directly calibrating the output embeddings of the model using an efficient and effective linear mapping. This mapping is powered by an edit operator that is obtained by solving a specially constructed least squares problem. Compared to implicit rule modification via long-time finetuning, our experimental results show that DREditor provides significant advantages on different domain-specific datasets, dataset sources, retrieval models, and computing devices. It consistently enhances time efficiency by 100-300 times while maintaining comparable or even superior retrieval performance. In a broader context, we take the first step to introduce a novel embedding calibration approach for the retrieval task, filling the technical blank in the current field of embedding calibration. This approach also paves the way for building domain-specific dense retrieval models efficiently and inexpensively.

We propose the new problem of choosing which dense retrieval model to use when searching on a new collection for which no labels are available, i.e. in a zero-shot setting. Many dense retrieval models are readily available. Each model however is characterized by very differing search effectiveness -- not just on the test portion of the datasets in which the dense representations have been learned but, importantly, also across different datasets for which data was not used to learn the dense representations. This is because dense retrievers typically require training on a large amount of labeled data to achieve satisfactory search effectiveness in a specific dataset or domain. Moreover, effectiveness gains obtained by dense retrievers on datasets for which they are able to observe labels during training, do not necessarily generalise to datasets that have not been observed during training. This is however a hard problem: through empirical experimentation we show that methods inspired by recent work in unsupervised performance evaluation with the presence of domain shift in the area of computer vision and machine learning are not effective for choosing highly performing dense retrievers in our setup. The availability of reliable methods for the selection of dense retrieval models in zero-shot settings that do not require the collection of labels for evaluation would allow to streamline the widespread adoption of dense retrieval. This is therefore an important new problem we believe the information retrieval community should consider. Implementation of methods, along with raw result files and analysis scripts are made publicly available at https://www.github.com/anonymized.

Neural ranking models (NRMs) and dense retrieval (DR) models have given rise to substantial improvements in overall retrieval performance. In addition to their effectiveness, and motivated by the proven lack of robustness of deep learning-based approaches in other areas, there is growing interest in the robustness of deep learning-based approaches to the core retrieval problem. Adversarial attack methods that have so far been developed mainly focus on attacking NRMs, with very little attention being paid to the robustness of DR models. In this paper, we introduce the adversarial retrieval attack (AREA) task. The AREA task is meant to trick DR models into retrieving a target document that is outside the initial set of candidate documents retrieved by the DR model in response to a query. We consider the decision-based black-box adversarial setting, which is realistic in real-world search engines. To address the AREA task, we first employ existing adversarial attack methods designed for NRMs. We find that the promising results that have previously been reported on attacking NRMs, do not generalize to DR models: these methods underperform a simple term spamming method. We attribute the observed lack of generalizability to the interaction-focused architecture of NRMs, which emphasizes fine-grained relevance matching. DR models follow a different representation-focused architecture that prioritizes coarse-grained representations. We propose to formalize attacks on DR models as a contrastive learning problem in a multi-view representation space. The core idea is to encourage the consistency between each view representation of the target document and its corresponding viewer via view-wise supervision signals. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can significantly outperform existing attack strategies in misleading the DR model with small indiscernible text perturbations.

The recent advancement in language representation modeling has broadly affected the design of dense retrieval models. In particular, many of the high-performing dense retrieval models evaluate representations of query and document using BERT, and subsequently apply a cosine-similarity based scoring to determine the relevance. BERT representations, however, are known to follow an anisotropic distribution of a narrow cone shape and such an anisotropic distribution can be undesirable for the cosine-similarity based scoring. In this work, we first show that BERT-based DR also follows an anisotropic distribution. To cope with the problem, we introduce unsupervised post-processing methods of Normalizing Flow and whitening, and develop token-wise method in addition to the sequence-wise method for applying the post-processing methods to the representations of dense retrieval models. We show that the proposed methods can effectively enhance the representations to be isotropic, then we perform experiments with ColBERT and RepBERT to show that the performance (NDCG at 10) of document re-ranking can be improved by 5.17\%$\sim$8.09\% for ColBERT and 6.88\%$\sim$22.81\% for RepBERT. To examine the potential of isotropic representation for improving the robustness of DR models, we investigate out-of-distribution tasks where the test dataset differs from the training dataset. The results show that isotropic representation can achieve a generally improved performance. For instance, when training dataset is MS-MARCO and test dataset is Robust04, isotropy post-processing can improve the baseline performance by up to 24.98\%. Furthermore, we show that an isotropic model trained with an out-of-distribution dataset can even outperform a baseline model trained with the in-distribution dataset.

Deep recommendation systems (DRS) heavily depend on specialized HPC hardware and accelerators to optimize energy, efficiency, and recommendation quality. Despite the growing number of hardware errors observed in large-scale fleet systems where DRS are deployed, the robustness of DRS has been largely overlooked. This paper presents the first systematic study of DRS robustness against hardware errors. We develop Terrorch, a user-friendly, efficient and flexible error injection framework on top of the widely-used PyTorch. We evaluate a wide range of models and datasets and observe that the DRS robustness against hardware errors is influenced by various factors from model parameters to input characteristics. We also explore 3 error mitigation methods including algorithm based fault tolerance (ABFT), activation clipping and selective bit protection (SBP). We find that applying activation clipping can recover up to 30% of the degraded AUC-ROC score, making it a promising mitigation method.

Recent years have witnessed the significant advance in dense retrieval (DR) based on powerful pre-trained language models (PLM). DR models have achieved excellent performance in several benchmark datasets, while they are shown to be not as competitive as traditional sparse retrieval models (e.g., BM25) in a zero-shot retrieval setting. However, in the related literature, there still lacks a detailed and comprehensive study on zero-shot retrieval. In this paper, we present the first thorough examination of the zero-shot capability of DR models. We aim to identify the key factors and analyze how they affect zero-shot retrieval performance. In particular, we discuss the effect of several key factors related to source training set, analyze the potential bias from the target dataset, and review and compare existing zero-shot DR models. Our findings provide important evidence to better understand and develop zero-shot DR models.

Few-shot dense retrieval (DR) aims to effectively generalize to novel search scenarios by learning a few samples. Despite its importance, there is little study on specialized datasets and standardized evaluation protocols. As a result, current methods often resort to random sampling from supervised datasets to create "few-data" setups and employ inconsistent training strategies during evaluations, which poses a challenge in accurately comparing recent progress. In this paper, we propose a customized FewDR dataset and a unified evaluation benchmark. Specifically, FewDR employs class-wise sampling to establish a standardized "few-shot" setting with finely-defined classes, reducing variability in multiple sampling rounds. Moreover, the dataset is disjointed into base and novel classes, allowing DR models to be continuously trained on ample data from base classes and a few samples in novel classes. This benchmark eliminates the risk of novel class leakage, providing a reliable estimation of the DR model's few-shot ability. Our extensive empirical results reveal that current state-of-the-art DR models still face challenges in the standard few-shot scene. Our code and data will be open-sourced at https://github.com/OpenMatch/ANCE-Tele.